Forward + backward looking M&A signals derived from SEC filings
4 layers · ~30 acquirers tracked
Updated {{ updatedAt }}
Not yet computed
Loading M&A intelligence…
M&A metrics not yet computed
The nightly pipeline recomputes these metrics — check back shortly, or refresh the page.
Four complementary M&A views — historical (who has been buying), structural (which unconnected pairs are close), forward-looking (the join: who’s likely to buy what next), and pattern (what KIND of deals each acquirer does). Sourced from SC TO-T tender offers, 8-K Item 7.01/8.01 press releases over the top 30 serial acquirers, and 10-Q / 10-K Acquisitions footnotes that catch sub-materiality giants like JNJ. Realism filters: Likely Next Deal requires the target be ≤25% of acquirer market cap and at least 2 distinct shared signals — drops "JNJ → AAPL"-style nonsense.
Companies that have filed an acquisition in the last 24 months — surfaces the *propensity* signal that the pairwise table below misses. Sourced from `TakeoverBid` (three passes: SC TO-T tender offers + 8-K Item 7.01/8.01 press releases scanned over the top 30 serial acquirers + 10-Q / 10-K Acquisitions footnotes for very-large-cap acquirers whose deals are sub-materiality at 8-K level) + Neo4j `RELATED` edges with type `MERGER` / `ACQUISITION` from 10-K + 8-K parsing. Now covers JNJ-style giants (Intra-Cellular, Shockwave, Halda) alongside mid-cap acquirers (Clario, Masimo, Wiz, Preqin).
No acquisition activity in the last 24 months in the current data.
> Likely Next Deal
Active Acquirers × Prediction Signals join
For each serial acquirer, the highest-scoring unconnected pair candidates from the M&A Prediction Signals — combining the *propensity* signal (this company has been buying) with the *latent connection* signal (this target is structurally close). Filtered for realism: target must be ≤25% of acquirer market cap, must have ≥2 distinct shared signals.
What KIND of deals each serial acquirer does — extracted from their actual deal history. Five dimensions: typical sectors, deal-size range, cadence (deals/year + dry-spell weeks), structure (cash/stock/mixed), hostile-percentage. Plus an LLM-generated 2-3 sentence narrative. Reads as "JNJ buys medtech at $14.5B median in all-cash deals, ~4 per year" — the actionable summary that lets you predict not just *whether* JNJ buys next, but *what kind*.
Deal Size
Median ${{ playbookMeta(p).deal_size.median_b }}B
Range ${{ playbookMeta(p).deal_size.min_b }}B–${{ playbookMeta(p).deal_size.max_b }}B
({{ playbookMeta(p).deal_size.n_disclosed }}/{{ playbookMeta(p).deal_count }} disclosed)
Cadence{{ playbookMeta(p).cadence.per_year }}/year
Last {{ playbookMeta(p).cadence.weeks_since_last }}w ago
Max gap {{ playbookMeta(p).cadence.longest_dry_spell_weeks }}w
Structure
{{ s.name }} {{ s.pct }}%
Hostile{{ playbookMeta(p).hostile_pct }}%
> M&A Prediction Signals
Unconnected Pairs, High Signal Overlap
Pairs of companies that are not directly connected in the graph but share an unusual amount of governance and supply-chain infrastructure. Score = 2×shared directors + shared auditor + shared suppliers + 0.5×same industry + 0.5×max(acquirer activity). The activity term boosts pairs where one side has a recent M&A track record. These are candidates where an announced deal would look "obvious in hindsight." Note: this is the broader unfiltered pair table — for actually-likely deals filtered for realism, see Likely Next Deal above.